What the TW Quant Score actually measures
methodologyscoreshorizons
Most stock scores tell you a number and leave you to guess what it means. That guess is where the trouble starts: a "92" that means strong momentum this week and a "92" that means cheap relative to book value are different claims about the world, and treating them as the same number is how people end up surprised.
So here is what the TW Quant Score is claiming, stated plainly.
One score, one horizon, one moment
The TW Quant Score rates a stock against its peers, for a specific time horizon, as of a specific day. All three qualifiers matter:
- Against its peers. It is a relative ranking, not an absolute verdict. A high score in a weak sector is still a high score in a weak sector.
- For a specific horizon. TradeWell scores ten of them, from days out to five years. The same stock can rank near the top for one horizon and in the middle for another, and that is not a contradiction — different horizons are different questions.
- As of a specific day. Every score carries the date it was computed. When the data behind it is stale or missing, we say so rather than serving you yesterday's number as though it were today's.
What goes into it
The score is built from over a hundred inputs per stock, spanning fundamental, technical, quantitative, and market-based signals. They are combined into one comparable number so that two stocks in different sectors can be placed on the same scale.
The important part is not the count. It is that the same framework is applied to every stock in coverage, every trading day. A score you cannot compare across names is not a ranking — it is an opinion with a number attached.
What it does not claim
This is the part most scores skip.
- It is not a prediction that a stock will go up. It is a relative ranking under a stated model, for a stated horizon.
- It is not advice. It does not know your timeline, your tax situation, your existing positions, or your tolerance for a bad quarter.
- It is not a guarantee of anything. Past model behaviour does not bind future markets, and any research product that implies otherwise is selling something other than research.
Where we stay silent
When a horizon has not been computed for a stock, we show that it has not been computed. When a metric is unavailable from our data providers, we show it as unavailable. We do not fill the gap with a zero, a dash that implies zero, or an estimate dressed as a measurement.
That choice costs us a tidier-looking screen. We think a visible gap is worth more than an invisible guess, because you cannot audit a number you were never told was missing.
How to read a score without over-reading it
A practical way to use it:
- Pick your horizon first. The ranking you want depends on the question you are actually asking.
- Look at the peer context, not just the number. Rank within a sector usually tells you more than the raw score.
- Check the date. A score is a snapshot; it ages.
- Treat it as one input. It is a starting point for research, not the end of it.
That is the whole claim. A comparable, dated, horizon-specific ranking built the same way for every stock we cover — and honest about the edges where it does not know.
Not investment advice.
Not investment advice. TradeWell Research LLC publishes research software and notes for informational purposes only. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
More: research library · methodology · stock screener by time horizon.